<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rewrites on Brian Faust</title><link>https://vacua.dev/tags/rewrites/</link><description>Recent content in Rewrites on Brian Faust</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vacua.dev/tags/rewrites/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A Rewrite Needs a Behavior Ledger</title><link>https://vacua.dev/thoughts/a-rewrite-needs-a-behavior-ledger/</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://vacua.dev/thoughts/a-rewrite-needs-a-behavior-ledger/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A desktop rewrite had screens for shipments, reports, settings, and logs. A
feature checklist could have marked those areas complete.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The old application also had behavior no screen list would reveal:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;a failed temporary-file cleanup must not turn a submitted print into a
failure, or the next run may print the label again;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;the first run treats older unprinted records differently from later runs;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;setup unlocks when a credential setting exists, not when its value is
non-empty; and&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;a visible report search box does nothing.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some of those rules protect operators. One is an awkward contract. One is
probably a dead feature. A rewrite cannot treat them all as “parity.”&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>