<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Planning on Brian Faust</title><link>https://vacua.dev/tags/planning/</link><description>Recent content in Planning on Brian Faust</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vacua.dev/tags/planning/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Technical Debt Is a Change Tax You Can Name</title><link>https://vacua.dev/thoughts/technical-debt-is-a-change-tax-you-can-name/</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://vacua.dev/thoughts/technical-debt-is-a-change-tax-you-can-name/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A retained compatibility change introduced a contract version and a measured
fallback lookup. Related work made acquisition atomic, separated expiration
from wall-clock dates, narrowed compatibility fields, enforced authorization,
and protected unselected drafts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That history proves several rules had to become explicit. It does not prove
that the old design charged technical-debt interest. The changes might be
planned slices, newly discovered requirements, corrections, or work a
different design would also need.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>